UK Column

2 recommendations and reviews from 1 person

Recommendations from MandyandPj L.

• Referral from January 6, 2015
  

  Shaun K. asked:

  I wonder if anyone can answer this: Is there anywhere to find the total amounts of cash borrowed since 1945 under each government? I have a feeling that the Tories will have borrowed massively more than Labour since WW2, but can only find figures which reflect borrowing as a proportion of GDP. I think the total amount that either party has borrowed over the last 70 years may be quite interesting - and useful in the months to come.

  

  MandyandPj L. replied:

  Nope, it sounds about right, what the slimey tories point out is the health of the nation, meaning people and then link that to wastage.....and serfs continue to fall for this, that unless serfs are suffering and in constant fear, too much money is bei ng 'wasted'. (I use the word serf instead of working classes) However, what also needs debated is this the way to run an economy by either side of politics. Basically the government borrows money from the banksters that create the money on lending (labour spends it on people wealth creating schemes whereas the tories spend it on their pals ensuring that serfs are kept in their place) A government then taxes the serfs to pay back these loans and not for other projects, the bankster system is bankster to government, serf to banksters via their loan collectors, the government. This is a debt based economy, this debt is paid back by us (and not the government) the principle with interest, much of the loan principle did not exist in the first place and none of the interest did. It gets to the stage where the banksters have governments by the short and curlies, where to be allowed to run governments, governments must do as they are told by the banksters, conditions set by the banksters, ie the IMF (international Mafia Fund) and the like. Their conditions are privatisation which is just another form of a lender taking collateral in lieu of cash. Since they have already nabbed most of this collateral and the level of debt can never be paid (as was the intention) it is harder to whitewash the books. Therefore, debating with the banksters (mafia capitalist) on what is best for the economy is pointless as far as socialists and all working classes are concerned. What should happen is that we should nationalize money (sovereign currency), we, via government should own, print and lend at cost and not at interest, our own currency and use it where it is needed. Governments have the power to be their own bankers at this level. The above is very very rough but there are groups out there that explain it fully, it was actually debated in parliament recently but not mentioned much on the banksters media. ( http://www.positivemoney.org/ ) and another group, the bradbury pound, ( http://www.ukcolumn.org/bring-back-the-bradbury ) What is happening today has happened before and it will get worse, regardless of who wins government (although labour attempts to buffer the serfs from the worse of it) , it most certainly will happen again until this bankster (financial industry that makes nothing but money out of other people's money, national collateral and now thin air) kind of economy (mafia capitalism and usury). It is also useless comparing today with 50 years ago or whatever, technological advances show that there is no need or much need for humans in 'economic activity' today (mass unemployment) other than as consumers. Therefore, the only appropriate way forward is the social wage leading onto a solution such as the one presented by Peter Joseph and the Zeitgeist movement. This system has to go but labour is most certainly the vehicle to do that when compared to the tory. This sort of stuff will be too much for the x factor brigade.......pj http://youtu.be/s6 a_0 zJDsr8

  

  MandyandPj L. replied:

  http://www.ukcolumn.org/bring-back-the-bradbury

  -1
  View full conversation on Facebook